Archetyp Links

Light Mode

Article Details

Expert says there is no digital proofs that turn on Zambelli to Delgatti

Published on September 10, 2025

Expert pointed to restrictions on access to part of the expert material - (Credit: Ed Alves/C.B/D.A/Press) The Constitution and Justice Commission (CCJ) of the House listened on Wednesday (10/9) the specialist in collecting and preserving digital tests Michel Spiero.He was summoned to detail technical aspects of the investigations that led to the conviction of licensed deputy Carla Zambelli (PL-SP) and hacker Walter Delgatti Neto. Spiero stated that there are no digital records that prove an explicit order of Zambelli so that Delgatti invades judiciary systems."There is no Whatsapp message, no documents she sent to him. I also checked if there could have been communication by third parties, but that was not identified either," he said. The expert pointed to restrictions on access to part of the expert material.According to him, Delgatti kept about 700 gigabytes of data stored in a cloud service (mega.io), whose content was not available for the defense of the parliamentary.In addition, emails created by the hacker to enable invasions have not been broken confidential."The Federal Police did not even request the break," he noted. Spiero also explained how Delgatti was able to access the National Council of Justice (CNJ) system.The hacker would have initially invaded private platforms, such as Github and Gitlab, until he got the token that allowed it to reach the CNJ."It was a complex process: he had to invade two other systems before accessing the CNJ system," he said. Follow the mail channel on WhatsApp and receive the main news of the day on your mobile Invasion history Asked if the case reports contradict the hacker's pattern, the expert denied.According to him, the records confirm that Delgatti had already made invasions in systems of companies such as IFood and Magazine Luiza, acting on his own, although he exchanged information with colleagues. In Spiero's assessment, Zambelli's linkage to the case is not supported by direct digital evidence, but in other elements.“The conclusions do not derive from the devices analyzed by me,” he said. The CCJ marked a new audience for September 17, when it will hear Carla Zambelli herself.