Archetyp Links

Light Mode

Article Details

Russian hackers transform European dams into arms

Published on August 16, 2025

European infrastructures are increasingly in the crosshairs of IT attacks and the latest victim was a Norwegian dam that has undergone a sabotage operation with potentially devastating consequences. The case of the Bremaner dam represents a worrying escalation in the digital war that is being fought between Russia and West, where weapons are no longer just malware and ransomware, but include remote control of vital infrastructure.This episode shows how geopolitical conflict has also moved definitively into digital domain, transforming dams, power plants and water systems into potential virtual battlefields. The attack that opened the pararatoly remotely The details of the operation reveal a sophisticated technical capacity by the attackers, who managed to access the industrial control systems of the dam and to open the patrols in a completely automated way.For about four consecutive hours, the system released 500 liters of water per second without anyone noticing it, a volume that could have caused significant damage to the valley if the attack had lasted longer.The discovery of the intrusion occurred only when the technical staff noticed anomalies in water flows, highlighting the vulnerability of automatic monitoring systems of critical infrastructures. The authors of the attack did not limit themselves to sabotage, but publicly claimed the operation through a three -minute video published on social media on the day of the attack.The video material contained clear references and logos of pro-Russian cybercriminal groups, suggesting a precise will to politically attribute the action rather than maintain it in the anonymity typical of other cybernetic operations. The strategy of digital terror Beate Gangås, head of the Norwegian police security service (PST), used this episode to illustrate what calls a Russian psychological destabilization strategy through cyberspace.According to his analysis, Moscow's primary objective would not be so much the material damage as the creation of an atmosphere of insecurity and fear between the western civilian population."Our Russo neighbor has become more dangerous," Gangås said on Wednesday, underlining how these attacks deliberately sights to "influence and cause fear and chaos among the general population". The digital war transforms civil infrastructures into military objectives The official attribution of the attack on Russia by the Norwegian authorities is based on investigative elements that go beyond social claims.The individuals identified as responsible for the operation were already known to intelligence services for their involvement in previous IT attacks against western objectives, suggesting the existence of an organized network of operators specialized in this type of digital sabotage. The Nordic countries in the crosshairs of Russian pressure Moscow's response to the Norwegian accusations came through traditional diplomatic channels, with the Russian embassy in Oslo that has branded Gangås's statements as "unfounded" and part of an attempt to "substantiate the mythical threat of Russian sabotage against Norwegian infrastructures".The Russian replica accused the PST of having "invented" this threat in a report published in February, now trying to find a rear tests to justify their assessments. The geopolitical context, however, makes these refusal not very credible, considering the intensification of Russian threats to the countries that support Ukraine and the specific pressure exerted on the Nordic countries to discourage them from adherence to NATO.Finland and Sweden have received explicit warnings against entry into the Atlantic alliance, warnings that have proved to be ineffective since both countries are now fully members of the organization. The particular vulnerability of Norway and Finland also derives from their geographical position, being the only Nordic countries to share direct terrestrial boundaries with Russia.Finland finds itself managing a frontier of over 1,300 kilometers with the eastern neighbor, while Norway must monitor about 200 kilometers of the Arctic border, creating unique challenges in terms of national security and protection of critical infrastructures.